{"id":93,"date":"2006-10-17T08:49:26","date_gmt":"2006-10-17T12:49:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=93"},"modified":"2006-10-17T09:20:57","modified_gmt":"2006-10-17T13:20:57","slug":"checking-in-week-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=93","title":{"rendered":"Checking In Week 6"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before we started, everyone should take a minute to stop and worship the Bears D in silence:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"94\" alt=\"Leinart.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/section30.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/10\/Leinart.thumbnail.jpg\" width=\"128\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Thanks!<\/p>\n<p>Gotta love the WORM&#8217;s optimism.\u00c2\u00a0 That is a true gambler at work.\u00c2\u00a0 I just hope he leads his sheep to the promised land, and not the wolves.\u00c2\u00a0 Let&#8217;s see if he made a turnaround as predicted:<\/p>\n<p>Cincinnati -6 over <strong>Tampa Bay<\/strong>:\u00c2\u00a0Bad start for the turnaround: <strong>0-1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Washington <\/strong>-9.5 over Tennessee: Really bad start: <strong>0-2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dallas <\/strong>-13 over Houston:\u00c2\u00a0OK, here we go: <strong>1-2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Buffalo pk over <strong>Detroit<\/strong>: Not looking so hot here.\u00c2\u00a0 On a side note, how many games this year will Detriot play in that are basically unwatchable?\u00c2\u00a0 My guess is 16: <strong>1-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>St. Louis<\/strong> +3.5 over Seattle: There is a chance: <strong>2-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Atlanta<\/strong> -2.5 over New York Giants: Surprise surprise: <strong>2-4<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Philadelphia -3 over <strong>Nawlins<\/strong>: Nope, that sound you hear is the WORM&#8217;s plane crashing: <strong>2-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Carolina +2.5 over <strong>Baltimore<\/strong>:OK, nice pick on the hometeam: <strong>3-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>NY Jets<\/strong> -2.5 over Miami: barely: <strong>4-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>San Diego -10 over <strong>San Francisco<\/strong>: easy one, but it is right: <strong>5-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Kansas City +7 over <strong>Pittsburgh<\/strong>:wow.\u00c2\u00a0 nope.\u00c2\u00a0 What is the deal with Big Ben?: <strong>5-6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Oakland +16 over <strong>Denver<\/strong>: nice pick, there was no way I would have picked that way: <strong>6-6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Chicago -10 over <strong>Arizona<\/strong>:I just want to apologize to the WORM for the offense performing like it did and not allowing the Bears to cover: <strong>6-7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Locks of the Week:\u00c2\u00a0 Take the Jets and the Eagles: Just <strong>1-1<\/strong> again.\u00c2\u00a0 Another lack luster effort after the prediction of a turnaround.\u00c2\u00a0 Gamblers, do not read this site.\u00c2\u00a0 I will let you know when it is safe again.<\/p>\n<p>Another losing week (in the red, not the pink) is not a good thing.\u00c2\u00a0 There must be some penalty instituted for Slim&#8217;s poor performance.\u00c2\u00a0 The staff is actively seeking suggestions from the audience for said punishment.<\/p>\n<p>Overall record: <strong>40-46-3 <\/strong>Still down overall, and it got worse this week.\u00c2\u00a0 Good news is that the hole isn&#8217;t all that deep, just gotta have some better picks.<\/p>\n<p>Any challengers?\u00c2\u00a0 Wagon, you have enough free time to make some picks.\u00c2\u00a0 I might have to recruit an outside contributor.\u00c2\u00a0 I&#8217;d hate to do that tho. Got someone in mind tho&#8230;..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before we started, everyone should take a minute to stop and worship the Bears D in silence: Thanks! Gotta love the WORM&#8217;s optimism.\u00c2\u00a0 That is a true gambler at work.\u00c2\u00a0 I just hope he leads his sheep to the promised land, and not the wolves.\u00c2\u00a0 Let&#8217;s see if he made a turnaround as predicted: Cincinnati &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=93\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Checking In Week 6<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=93"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=93"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=93"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=93"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}