{"id":86,"date":"2006-10-03T15:03:32","date_gmt":"2006-10-03T19:03:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=86"},"modified":"2006-10-03T15:03:32","modified_gmt":"2006-10-03T19:03:32","slug":"checking-in-week-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=86","title":{"rendered":"Checking In Week 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’ll follow Slim’s rapid fire ways with my own PTI style baby.\u00c2\u00a0 But a quick plug for my dominating 4-0 Bears<\/strong>.\u00c2\u00a0 There, let’s go:<\/p>\n

San Francisco +7 over Kansas City – How wrong can you be? Huard basically tea bagged the WORM for lack of faith: 0-1<\/strong><\/p>\n

San Diego -2.5 over Baltimore – Wrong again.\u00c2\u00a0 All hail the murderer: 0-2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nawlins +7 over Carolina – least he could his team right: 1-2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Minnesota +1 over Buffalo – Wrong.\u00c2\u00a0 I wouldn’t have written anything either.\u00c2\u00a0 Only Luscious and his boy little Simms cared about the outcome here: 1-3<\/strong><\/p>\n

Miami -3.5 over Houston – Don’t sleep on Super Mario.\u00c2\u00a0 And Culpepper sucks worse than the Texans: 1-4<\/strong><\/p>\n

Indy -9 over NYJ – Wrong, even with the Colts dropping 31.\u00c2\u00a0 Pennington to Cotcherry all day my friend: 1-5<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tennessee +9.5 over Dallas – Holy shit, this is almost as bad a call as the KC game: 1-6<\/strong><\/p>\n

Atlanta -7.5 over Arizona – when, at least there are 2 correct picks: 2-6<\/strong><\/p>\n

St. Louis -5.5 over Detriot – OK, back to Slim’s winning ways, but a lot of ground to make up.\u00c2\u00a0 And Kitna is next weeks fantasy sleeper, just don’t forget who gave you the tip: 3-6<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cincinnati -6 over New England – Ouch, so much for the winning ways.\u00c2\u00a0 Never count out the Pats: 3-7<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jax -3 over Washington – Did the D even touch Brunell?\u00c2\u00a0 And portis’ return continues, helping me trample the busted ass so called “wagon”: 3-8<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cleveland -2.5 over Oakland – Right, at least we didn’t have to see Brooks this week, although Curry was sighted throwing another one in the dirt: 4-8<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chicago -2.5 over Seattle – Good pick.\u00c2\u00a0 Always pick my Bears: 5-8<\/strong><\/p>\n

Philly -11 over Green Bay -ends on a good note.\u00c2\u00a0 And I hate to say it, but Farve shouldn’t have\u00c2\u00a0come back: 6-8<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lead Pipe Locks: Indy, Cleveland, St. Louis, and Jacksonville: 2-2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Another lack luster effort from Calhoun here.\u00c2\u00a0 You would almost think that Slim’s younger brother Brian (Luke knows Brian too) beat Slim over the head and started making the picks.<\/p>\n

Overall Record: 26-33-1<\/strong><\/p>\n

3 losing weeks out of 4.\u00c2\u00a0 Unless there is a drastic improvement, this group may have to revoke its endorsement of Calhoun, the betting master.\u00c2\u00a0 His poor picks have really been hurting the unsuspecting gamblers out there.\u00c2\u00a0 Let’s hope he doesn’t have another week of subpar EFFORT and performance.\u00c2\u00a0 Good luck SLIM.<\/p>\n

We also have yet to have any person (Luke) step up to the plate and challenge the WORM.\u00c2\u00a0 I guess he is too busy chasing the co-eds around the GROVE and getting no where.\u00c2\u00a0 At least the WORM is man enough to submit his picks to everyone and take the abuse like a whipped man.\u00c2\u00a0 And he gets more than you too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’ll follow Slim’s rapid fire ways with my own PTI style baby.\u00c2\u00a0 But a quick plug for my dominating 4-0 Bears.\u00c2\u00a0 There, let’s go: San Francisco +7 over Kansas City – How wrong can you be? Huard basically tea bagged the WORM for lack of faith: 0-1 San Diego -2.5 over Baltimore – Wrong again.\u00c2\u00a0 … Continue reading Checking In Week 4<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=86"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=86"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=86"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=86"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}