Well, I took the week off, so I can’t say much to Slim.\u00c2\u00a0 Plus, his fantasy team whipped mine.\u00c2\u00a0 Although I still have a solid lead over the crowd chasing me.\u00c2\u00a0 Portis is a pussy.<\/p>\n
We’ll check in on how Wang and the good Doc did:<\/p>\n
Baltimore<\/strong> (-7) at Tennessee: (0-1-0) Got the win but couldn’t cover.\u00c2\u00a0 Gotta say that VY is doing better than I thought.\u00c2\u00a0 Gotta thank Chow….<\/p>\n Buffalo at Indianapolis<\/strong> (-12.5): (0-2-0) The good Doc’s Bills actually played this week…<\/p>\n Chicago<\/strong> at N.Y. Giants 1:00 p.m. (Pick \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcem): (1-2-0) Go with the Bears my friend..nice job. Green Bay<\/strong> at Minnesota (-5.5) 1:00 p.m.: (3-2-0) Only two TDs for Favre, but Green Bay covered..weird to hear that this year.<\/p>\n Houston at Jacksonville <\/strong>(-10.5) 1:00 p.m.: (3-3-0) Houston pulls the upset…How about a QB controversy for both teams?<\/p>\n Kansas City<\/strong> (-1) at Miami 1:00 p.m.: (3-4-0) Fins turning it around, just like last year…winning AFTER it matters.<\/p>\n New Orleans<\/strong> at Pittsburgh (-4.5) 1:00 p.m.: (3-5-0) Brees did have a good day, too bad the NO D didn’t…<\/p>\n N.Y. Jets<\/strong> at New England (10.5) 1:00 p.m.: (4-5-0) Another nice call.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n San Diego<\/strong> (-1.5) at Cincinnati 1:00 p.m.: (5-5-0) EERIE……<\/p>\n San Francisco<\/strong> at Detroit (-6) 1:00 p.m.: (6-5-0) the UNCC team wins…<\/p>\n Washington at Philadelphia<\/strong> (-7) 1:00 p.m.: (7-5-0) Easy call, but got it right…<\/p>\n Denver<\/strong> (-9) at Oakland <\/strong>4:05 p.m.: (8-5-0) Denver fails to cover…….<\/p>\n Dallas (-7) at Arizona <\/strong>4:15 p.m.: (8-6-0) TO catches at least one TD…..<\/p>\n St. Louis<\/strong> at Seattle (-3.5) 4:15 p.m.: (9-6-0) Nice call on a close game<\/p>\n Tampa Bay at Carolina <\/strong>(-9) 8:30 p.m.: (10-6-0) Eerie part duex<\/p>\n Nice job Wang.\u00c2\u00a0 Best week by anyone so far.<\/p>\n Now that the good Doc can understand that bold is for the home team, not his picks:<\/p>\n Baltimore<\/strong> (-7) at Tennessee: (0-1-0) D not so impressive, huh Vince?<\/p>\n Buffalo<\/strong> at Indianapolis (-12.5): (1-1-0) WOW<\/p>\n Chicago at N.Y. Giants<\/strong> (Pick \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcem): (1-2-0) Why must I constantly inform people to not pick agaisnt my Bears Houston at Jacksonville <\/strong>(-10.5): (3-3-0) poor Garrad is right, but the Texans win<\/p>\n New Orleans<\/strong> at Pittsburgh (-4.5): (3-5-0) Should’ve picked against them this week San Francisco at Detroit<\/strong> (-6): (5-6-0)<\/p>\n Washington at Philadelphia<\/strong> (-7): (6-6-0) Easy call Dallas<\/strong> (-7) at Arizona:(7-7-0) Romo is the man….<\/p>\n St. Louis at Seattle<\/strong> (-3.5): (7-8-0) too close a win Wang is the new master……..<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Well, I took the week off, so I can’t say much to Slim.\u00c2\u00a0 Plus, his fantasy team whipped mine.\u00c2\u00a0 Although I still have a solid lead over the crowd chasing me.\u00c2\u00a0 Portis is a pussy. We’ll check in on how Wang and the good Doc did: Baltimore (-7) at Tennessee: (0-1-0) Got the win but … Continue reading Checking In – Week 10<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\nCleveland<\/strong> at Atlanta (-8.5) 1:00 p.m.: (2-2-0) Called the upset.\u00c2\u00a0 Get a little credit here….<\/p>\n
\n
\nCleveland<\/strong> at Atlanta (-8.5): (2-2-0) Nice call
\n
\nGreen Bay<\/strong> at Minnesota (-5.5): (3-2-0) barely, and only narey a pick<\/p>\n
\n
\nN.Y. Jets<\/strong> at New England (10.5): (4-5-0) Nice pick, and Pennington would’ve not been too bad a start
\n
\nSan Diego<\/strong> (-1.5) at Cincinnati: (5-5-0) FJ has a great game<\/p>\n
\n
\nDenver<\/strong> (-9) at Oakland: (6-7-0) DEN gets the W but can’t cover against the lowly bored Raiders<\/p>\n
\n
\nTampa Bay<\/strong> at Carolina (-9): (7-9-0) Galloway gets no TDs<\/p>\n