{"id":109,"date":"2006-11-10T10:31:31","date_gmt":"2006-11-10T14:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=109"},"modified":"2006-11-10T12:45:33","modified_gmt":"2006-11-10T16:45:33","slug":"checking-in-week-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=109","title":{"rendered":"Checking in Week 9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Because Ben is a slack ass\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6<\/p>\n<p><strong>Grading Slim:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>St Louis<\/strong> -2 over Kansas City\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(0-1-0)<br \/>\nAPB on Torry Holt.<\/p>\n<p>Cincinnati +3 over <strong>Baltimore<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(1-1-0)<br \/>\nPalmer is the starting QB of a certain 2-7 fantasy team; you should know better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NY Giants<\/strong> -13 over Houston\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(1-2-0)<br \/>\nMario with the fade away!!\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jacksonville<\/strong> -10 over Tennessee\u00c2\u00a0(2-2-0)<br \/>\nI\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve hated Garrard since 1999.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Dallas -3 over <strong>Washington<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(2-2-1)<br \/>\nBonehead personal foul and good hustle pushed this one.<\/p>\n<p>Green Bay +3.5 over <strong>Buffalo<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(2-3-1)<br \/>\nImagine that: McGahee out indefinitely.\u00c2\u00a0 Bet you can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t guess who has him.<\/p>\n<p>New Orleans -1 over <strong>Tampa<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(2-4-1)<br \/>\nWhen will people quit picking against Nawlins?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Detroit<\/strong> +5.5 over Atlanta \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(3-4-1)<br \/>\nVick is obviously the greatest QB ever.\u00c2\u00a0 Tremendous knee control.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>Chicago<\/strong> -13.5 over Miami \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(3-5-1)<br \/>\nDude in our actually office got this one right in a vendor pool (he forgot to fill out his form and in that case, it defaults to the visiting team as the pick)<\/p>\n<p><strong>San<\/strong> <strong>Francisco<\/strong> +5 over Minnesota \u00c2\u00a0(4-5-1)<br \/>\nHas anyone else noticed that the Scandinavians left the bitter cold climate for a more bitter cold climate?\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>San<\/strong> <strong>Diego<\/strong> -12.5 over Cleveland \u00c2\u00a0(4-6-1)<br \/>\nIf the Bolts either lose or don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t cover, Football Jesus has His reasons and who are we, mere mortals, to question Him?<\/p>\n<p>Denver +3 over <strong>Pittsburgh<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(4-7-1)<br \/>\nI hope they run that sorry-assed bum Cowher out of Pittsburgh; what a loser.<\/p>\n<p>Indy +3 over <strong>New England<\/strong> \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(4-8-1)<br \/>\nThat\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s it, pick against Peyton before Thanksgiving.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Seattle<\/strong> -7 over Oakland \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(5-8-1)<br \/>\nI think -7 was the Nielson Rating on this one.<\/p>\n<p>Locks of the Week: Take the Cowboys, Giants, and the Chargers<br \/>\nWrong.\u00c2\u00a0 Wrong.\u00c2\u00a0 Wrong.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Season: <strong>54-71-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Grading Xiang Cha Pang Wa:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Chiefs<\/strong> at Rams (-2.5)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(1-0-0)<\/p>\n<p>Bungals (+3) at <strong>Ravens<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(2-0-0)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Giants<\/strong> (-13) at Texans\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(2-1-0)<\/p>\n<p>Titans (+9.5) at <strong>Jags<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(3-1-0)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cowgirls<\/strong> (-3) at Skins\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(3-1-1)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Packers<\/strong> (+3) at Bills\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(3-2-1)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ain\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ts<\/strong> (-1) at Bucs\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(4-2-1)<\/p>\n<p>Lions (+5.5) at <strong>Falcons<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(4-3-1)<\/p>\n<p>Bears (-13.5) at <strong>Dolphines<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(5-3-1)<\/p>\n<p>Vikings at <strong>49ers<\/strong> (+5)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(6-3-1)<\/p>\n<p>Browns at <strong>Bolts<\/strong> (-12.5)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(6-4-1)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Broncos<\/strong> at Steelers (-3)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(7-4-1)<\/p>\n<p>Colts (+3) at <strong>Pats<\/strong>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(7-5-1)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Raiders<\/strong> (+7.5) at Seahawks\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(7-6-1)<\/p>\n<p>I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t find the Mandarin keys on my keyboard, so I was unable to comment on any of these.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Alvin beat Worm.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Because Ben is a slack ass\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 Grading Slim: St Louis -2 over Kansas City\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(0-1-0) APB on Torry Holt. Cincinnati +3 over Baltimore\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(1-1-0) Palmer is the starting QB of a certain 2-7 fantasy team; you should know better. NY Giants -13 over Houston\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(1-2-0) Mario with the fade away!!\u00c2\u00a0 Jacksonville -10 over Tennessee\u00c2\u00a0(2-2-0) I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve hated Garrard since &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=109\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Checking in Week 9<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}