{"id":101,"date":"2006-10-31T09:09:11","date_gmt":"2006-10-31T13:09:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=101"},"modified":"2006-10-31T09:16:38","modified_gmt":"2006-10-31T13:16:38","slug":"101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=101","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, the Bears dominated again.\u00c2\u00a0 Shades of &#8217;85 if you ask me.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"84\" alt=\"full.getty-71465363cc019_san_francisco_4_13_36_pm.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/section30.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/10\/full.getty-71465363cc019_san_francisco_4_13_36_pm.thumbnail.jpg\" width=\"128\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And I was the brave soul that stepped up.\u00c2\u00a0 Since Wagon and the Doc were a little scared to try Slim out.\u00c2\u00a0 I&#8217;ll do the regular review and then compare mine picks to Slim&#8217;s.\u00c2\u00a0 Here we go:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tennessee<\/strong> -3 over Houston: Right on.\u00c2\u00a0 I like for that first one to be correct.\u00c2\u00a0 Makes me feel warm inside: <strong>1-0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Philly<\/strong> -7 over Jax: Nope, that Jax D made a comeback after a couple of off weeks: <strong>1-1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Cincinnati<\/strong> &#8211; 4 over Atlanta: Vick is making his prescence felt, and I&#8217;m not talking about the herpes: <strong>1-2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Tampa +9 over <strong>NYG<\/strong>: Gradoaignoeski has nothing for that awakening GMEN D: <strong>1-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Chicago<\/strong> -16 over San Francisco: Gotta go with the Bears, glad you have learned this: <strong>2-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Green Bay<\/strong> -3.5 over Arizona: Easy pick, why didn&#8217;t I take them?: <strong>3-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Kansas City<\/strong> -6 over Seattle: Nice, although Wallace wasn&#8217;t as bad as I thought.\u00c2\u00a0 LJ is the damn man: <strong>4-3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Nawlins<\/strong> -2 over Baltlimore: Nope, Billick calling the run certainly helped this week: <strong>4-4<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>St Louis -9.5 over <strong>San Diego<\/strong>: FJ has another solid game&#8230;.: <strong>4-5<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pittsburgh -8.5 over <strong>Oakland<\/strong>: Umm, I think Roeaoiugbireburger was still concussed: <strong>4-6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>NY Jets +2.5 over <strong>Cleveland<\/strong>: Nope.\u00c2\u00a0 Jets are sucking these days: <strong>4-7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Indianapolis +3 over <strong>Denver<\/strong>: Another damn TIE, kinda like kissing your sister: <strong>4-7-1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dallas +5 over <strong>Carolina<\/strong>: Went against the home team and was correct.\u00c2\u00a0 Gotta have balls to do that: <strong>5-7-1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>New England -1.5 over <strong>Minnesota<\/strong>: Easy call here, but you got it right: <strong>6-7-1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10 Star Locks of the Week: KC, Jets, and NO: <strong>1-2<\/strong><strong> <\/strong>The bad thing is that is performance is an improvement.\u00c2\u00a0 That is simply a disgrace.\u00c2\u00a0 Even more embarrassing should be Slim&#8217;s &#8220;locks&#8221;.\u00c2\u00a0 That is pitiful, and simply unacceptable.<\/p>\n<p>Overall Record: <strong>49-63-4<\/p>\n<p><\/strong>Now on to the fun part.\u00c2\u00a0 My record is: the exact same.\u00c2\u00a0 Guess it is a little harder than you think.I understand that we have a challenger to try SLIM on for size this week.\u00c2\u00a0 Will the real WANG please stand up.<\/p>\n<p>Said challenger should email his picks against the spread to me prioir to 1 PM this coming Sunday.\u00c2\u00a0 If, said challenger can pass the rigorous standards in place at Section 30, then they might be able to post directly.\u00c2\u00a0 Have to grovel to the WAGON to see.<\/p>\n<p>Also of note, my fantasy completely embarrassed the Doc&#8217;s team, by more than doubling his weak ass score.\u00c2\u00a0 My team is now 7-1 and sitting pretty after passing through most of the bye weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Till next week&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well, the Bears dominated again.\u00c2\u00a0 Shades of &#8217;85 if you ask me. And I was the brave soul that stepped up.\u00c2\u00a0 Since Wagon and the Doc were a little scared to try Slim out.\u00c2\u00a0 I&#8217;ll do the regular review and then compare mine picks to Slim&#8217;s.\u00c2\u00a0 Here we go: Tennessee -3 over Houston: Right on.\u00c2\u00a0 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/section30.com\/?p=101\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\"><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/section30.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}